The Electric Spinach Perspective

Managing a single EV charging installation can be relatively straightforward. Managing charging infrastructure across an entire property portfolio is something very different. For many managing agents, EV charging has evolved from being a one-off capital project into an ongoing operational responsibility.

A portfolio may include:

  • Office buildings.
  • Business parks.
  • Mixed-use developments.
  • Residential estates.
  • Retail parks.
  • Industrial properties.
  • Public car parks.

Each property may have:

  • Different charger manufacturers.
  • Different software platforms.
  • Different maintenance contractors.
  • Different landlord requirements.
  • Different occupiers.
  • Different electrical capacities.
  • Different reporting obligations.

Without a consistent management strategy, the result can quickly become fragmented. One site may receive regular inspections. Another may have no maintenance history. One backend platform may generate detailed reports. Another may require manual intervention. One landlord may receive monthly performance data. Another receives none at all.

Managing agents are increasingly expected to bring consistency to environments that have often developed organically over many years. The challenge is no longer installing EV chargers. It is operating them professionally across an entire portfolio.

Quick Answer

Managing agents should treat EV charging infrastructure in the same way they manage every other critical building service.

That means developing consistent arrangements for:

  • Compliance.
  • Maintenance.
  • Software management.
  • Performance monitoring.
  • Contractor management.
  • Reporting.
  • Asset planning.
  • Tenant communication.

Rather than managing each charger individually, successful organisations develop a portfolio-wide operating model that delivers consistency across every property.

Standardisation reduces complexity

One of the biggest operational challenges for managing agents is inconsistency. Different properties often inherit different charging systems over time. A typical portfolio might include:

  • Multiple charger manufacturers.
  • Several backend software platforms.
  • Different maintenance providers.
  • Various tariff structures.
  • Different access arrangements.
  • Different inspection frequencies.

Each variation increases operational complexity. Standardising processes, even where hardware differs, can significantly improve efficiency. For example, every site might follow the same approach to:

  • Fault reporting.
  • Preventative maintenance.
  • Compliance inspections.
  • Performance reporting.
  • Contractor response times.
  • Record keeping.

The objective is not necessarily to standardise every charger. It is to standardise how the infrastructure is managed.

Visibility is essential

Managing agents cannot effectively manage infrastructure they cannot see.

Portfolio-wide visibility allows organisations to understand:

  • Which chargers are operational.
  • Which chargers are offline.
  • Maintenance history.
  • Inspection dates.
  • Fault trends.
  • Utilisation levels.
  • Energy consumption.
  • User activity.

This information helps move management from being reactive to proactive.

Instead of discovering faults after tenant complaints, issues can often be identified and addressed much earlier.

Maintenance should be portfolio-led

As charging estates grow, arranging maintenance individually for every property becomes increasingly inefficient. Many managing agents benefit from adopting a portfolio-wide maintenance strategy. This may include:

  • Planned preventative maintenance programmes.
  • Standard inspection schedules.
  • Consistent contractor management.
  • Agreed service levels.
  • Centralised reporting.
  • Coordinated remedial works.

Managing maintenance across the portfolio rather than on a site-by-site basis often improves consistency while reducing administration.

Software should simplify management, not complicate it

Modern charging infrastructure generates significant amounts of operational data. However, data only creates value if it can be interpreted easily. Managing agents should consider whether their software platform provides:

  • Multi-site dashboards.
  • Portfolio reporting.
  • User management.
  • Tariff administration.
  • Remote diagnostics.
  • Energy reporting.
  • Role-based permissions.
  • Audit trails.

Where multiple software platforms exist across a portfolio, organisations should understand how data will be consolidated to support informed decision-making.

Responsibilities should be clearly defined

Managing agents often operate between several stakeholders. These may include:

  • Building owners.
  • Occupiers.
  • Maintenance contractors.
  • Software providers.
  • Electrical contractors.
  • Facilities teams.
  • Concierge staff.

Without clearly defined responsibilities, operational issues can become everyone’s problem, or nobody’s. Successful portfolios usually establish clear ownership for:

  • Fault response.
  • Contractor appointments.
  • Maintenance approvals.
  • User communications.
  • Tariff changes.
  • Software administration.
  • Compliance records.
  • Performance reporting.

Clear governance reduces delays and improves accountability.

Reporting creates confidence

Landlords increasingly expect visibility of how building assets are performing. EV charging infrastructure should be no different. Regular reporting may include:

  • Charger availability.
  • Uptime.
  • Fault response times.
  • Maintenance activity.
  • Energy usage.
  • Carbon reporting.
  • User numbers.
  • Future capacity planning.

Consistent reporting enables managing agents to demonstrate that charging infrastructure is being actively managed rather than simply left to operate unattended.

Think like a portfolio manager, not a site manager

One of the biggest mindset changes is moving away from managing individual sites in isolation. Instead, organisations should ask questions such as:

  • Which assets generate the highest maintenance demand?
  • Are certain charger models producing recurring faults?
  • Which sites are approaching electrical capacity?
  • Where should future investment be prioritised?
  • Which maintenance activities could be standardised?

Looking across the portfolio often reveals opportunities that would never become apparent when viewing each property independently.

EV charging is becoming another managed service

Twenty years ago, few managing agents actively monitored lifts, fire alarms or HVAC performance through cloud-based platforms. Today, this is entirely normal. EV charging is following the same path.

The organisations that establish robust operational processes today will be better positioned as charging demand continues to increase across commercial property.

Rather than becoming another maintenance burden, charging infrastructure can become a professionally managed service that enhances the overall quality of the estate.

Common misconceptions

“Each property should manage its own chargers.”
While individual sites have unique requirements, consistency across the portfolio usually delivers better operational outcomes.

“Managing EV chargers is simply the installer’s responsibility.”
Installers play an important role during delivery, but long-term operational management typically sits with landlords, managing agents or appointed infrastructure management providers.

“More data automatically means better management.”
Only if the data is converted into meaningful operational insights that support better decision-making.

“Every property needs identical hardware.”
Not necessarily. Different sites may require different equipment, but they should still be managed using consistent operational principles.

Looking beyond

individual sites

Managing agents are increasingly responsible for complex portfolios that combine traditional building services with new digital infrastructure. EV charging is part of this evolution.

The organisations that succeed will not necessarily be those with the newest chargers. They will be the organisations with the most consistent operational processes.

By standardising compliance, maintenance, reporting and governance across multiple assets, managing agents can reduce operational risk, improve tenant satisfaction and provide greater confidence to landlords and asset owners.

Evidence & Guidance

Managing EV charging across multiple commercial properties should be informed by recognised legislation, standards and industry guidance, including:

Legislation

Standards & Guidance

  • BS 7671 – Requirements for Electrical Installations (IET Wiring Regulations)
  • IET Code of Practice for Electric Vehicle Charging Equipment Installation
  • OCPP (Open Charge Point Protocol) for interoperability across multiple charging systems.
  • RISC Authority RC59, where fire safety and operational risk form part of portfolio management.
  • RICS guidance relating to commercial property management and EV charging.

Important: Every property portfolio is unique. Effective management should reflect the size of the estate, the charging technologies deployed, landlord objectives and the operational requirements of each building while maintaining consistent management standards across the portfolio.